Rodent populations recovering from fire in an East Mediterranean woodland

I. Izhaki, A. Haim, O. Zohar

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

Abstract

Fire in woodlands causes a dramatic decrease in rodent populations. The aim of this study was to detect rodent succession in three different management regimes of a post-fire habitat on Mount Carmel: (1) a control area of mixed woodlands of burnt pine and oak; (2) a mixed burnt woodland in which the burnt pine trees were cut and left in situ; and (3) a mixed burnt woodland in which burnt pines were cut and removed from the plot. Two plots in an unburnt mixed woodland were used as controls. The first invader species observed in the post-fire habitats were Mus macedonicus, which was the most abundant species in all burnt plots, Gerbillus dasyurus, which was mainly trapped in plots where the burnt pine trees were removed, and Meriones tristrami, which was mainly trapped in plots where the burnt pine trees were left in situ. The highest species diversity was recorded in the control plots of the burnt pine and oak woodland. In these burnt control plots the field mice (Apodemus) of both species reappeared. However, the numbers of trapped A. flavicollis were rather higher than of A. mystacinus. It is thus assumed that the invading species will be replaced by the original woodland rodent species through resilience.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)539-545
Number of pages7
JournalWater Science and Technology
Volume27
Issue number7-8
DOIs
StatePublished - 1993
EventProceedings of the 5th International Conference on Environmental Quality and Ecosystem Stability - Jerusalem, Isr
Duration: 1 Jun 19921 Jun 1992

Keywords

  • Fire
  • Mount Carmel
  • Recolonization
  • Resilience
  • Rodents
  • Woodland

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Water Science and Technology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rodent populations recovering from fire in an East Mediterranean woodland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this