Abstract
Social mechanisms explaining Danes’ attitudes to asylum seekers were analysed on two main dimensions: border control and rights allocation, in a national survey of 500 adult respondents in September 2013. Data show that the respondents supported exclusionary practices against asylum seekers much more than exclusion from rights. Three main mechanisms were simultaneously at play in both exclusionary dimensions: perceptions of threat, social distance (prejudice), and perceiving asylum seekers as not “genuine refugees”. Identifying asylum seekers’ as a security and socio-economic threat, as persons not in “real” fear of persecution, together with prejudicial attitudes to them had a boosting effect on excluding asylum seekers from the Danish collective in terms of entry and rights. Findings are discussed in light of existing theories on exclusionary attitudes to asylum seekers.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 787-806 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Ethnic and Racial Studies |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 15 Mar 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- Attitudes
- Denmark
- asylum seekers
- bogus refugees
- perceptions of threat
- prejudice
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Cultural Studies
- Anthropology
- Sociology and Political Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Restrictive borders and rights: attitudes of the Danish public to asylum seekers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver