Response to Five Critics

Yitzhak Benbaji, Daniel Statman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


In response to our critics, we explain why in spite of the ad bellum breach involved in the first use of force the war agreement is still binding; why the moral symmetry to which War by Agreement subscribes benefits all parties, weak and strong; why contractarianism leaves room the for moral option of not acting within one's rights and refusing to take part in a seemingly unjust war; why contractarianism is superior to rights-consequentialism as a theory of just war; and why contractarianism does not rule out reforms in international law and institutions.

Original languageEnglish
JournalLaw and Philosophy
StateAccepted/In press - 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Yitzhak Benbaji's research was supported by the Israeli Research Foundation (grant number 396/18).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Law


Dive into the research topics of 'Response to Five Critics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this