Response to “Dubious Premises— Evil Conclusions: Moral Reasoning at the Nuremberg Trials” by Edmund D. Pellegrino and David C. Thomasma (CQ Vol 9, No 2)

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Debate

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)99-102
Number of pages4
JournalCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Policy

Cite this