Relationships of Biomedical Beliefs About Depression to Treatment-Related Expectancies in a Treatment-Seeking Sample

Matthew S. Lebowitz, Tohar Dolev-Amit, Sigal Zilcha-Mano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Like other mental disorders, major depression is increasingly explained as a biomedical illness. We examined, in a treatment-seeking sample, whether attributing one’s depression to biomedical causes would be associated with pessimistic psychotherapy treatment expectancies. Individuals seeking psychotherapy for depression rated their endorsement of biomedical explanations for their symptoms,expectations regarding treatment outcome, and expectations about forming a working alliance with a therapist. We found that treatment seekers’ endorsement of biomedical explanations for their symptoms was associated with pessimism about treatment being successful. This pessimism was, in turn, associated with holding more negative expectancies about one’s ability to form a strong therapeutic alliance with a therapist. Given the ascendancy of biomedical explanations for depression and the influence of patient expectancies on clinical outcomes, strategies for disassociating biomedical attributions from pessimistic expectancies may be needed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)366-371
Number of pages6
JournalPsychotherapy
Volume58
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Psychological Association

Keywords

  • alliance
  • biomedical attributions
  • depression
  • expectancies
  • prognostic pessimism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Relationships of Biomedical Beliefs About Depression to Treatment-Related Expectancies in a Treatment-Seeking Sample'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this