Rectal examinations in childbirth: the violence and humiliation of a silenced practice

Sara Cohen Shabot, Dianna Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Post-vaginal birth protocols frequently require women and other birthing persons to undergo rectal examinations. Protocols for these examinations, which we refer to as PVREs, vary widely, however, and there is a lack of agreement within the medical community concerning whether they are needed at all. This article explores women’s experience of PVREs in light of this ambiguity which, we argue, reflects and reproduces aspects of gendered power relations that are implicated in systemic sexual violence. We show that some women experience PVREs as sexual violence, the effects of which include guilt, self-blame, shame and sexual humiliation. Given its defining characteristics, we further argue that PVREs constitute a form of obstetric violence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)321-336
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Gender-Based Violence
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Authors 2024.

Keywords

  • obstetric violence
  • rectal examinations
  • sexual violence
  • women’s embodied experience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rectal examinations in childbirth: the violence and humiliation of a silenced practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this