Re-evaluating subsistence skills of Levantine Middle and Upper Palaeolithic hunters: A comparison of the faunal assemblages

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

It has long been argued that there were qualitative differences in the procurement strategies of the Middle and Upper Palaeolithic, with the hominids of the earlier period being less capable and efficient hunters than those of the subsequent period. This hypothesis is tested here through an examination of faunal assemblages from the two periods in the Levant by comparing measures of species diversity. It is concluded that no significant differences in hunting can be documented and that the hominids of both periods can be characterized as efficient foragers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)217-229
Number of pages13
JournalOxford Journal of Archaeology
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Archaeology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Re-evaluating subsistence skills of Levantine Middle and Upper Palaeolithic hunters: A comparison of the faunal assemblages'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this