Abstract
Many studies have reported that US presidents often become more popular at the onset of wars and other security crises. Research on this “rally-round-the-flag” phenomenon has focused on either rational calculation of success, chances of military actions, popular perceptions of security threats, or the role of opinion leaders. This paper proposes a new approach: I argue that challenges to the symbolic status of the nation vis-à-vis other nations drive rally periods. This study examines the rally-round-the-flag phenomenon from a comparative historical perspective, using a new database of war events and security crises from 1950-2006. The analysis reveals that two types of status challenges result in nationalist rally reactions: first, the public has rallied behind presidents when wars and security crises were viewed as an opportunity for the United States to reclaim its previously damaged national honor; and second, rallies have emerged when the president claimed the mantle of “leader of the free world” in an internationally authorized coalition attack on a foreign country.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 305-338 |
Number of pages | 34 |
Journal | Social Science History |
Volume | 40 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2016 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© Social Science History Association, 2016.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- History
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)