Putting auditing in the context of democratic governance: the question of auditing discretion from the public’s perspective

Dana Natan-Krup, Shlomo Mizrahi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We explore public attitudes towards public auditing to reveal the sources of the legitimacy granted to state auditors to exercise their discretion, and apply a broad-based approach to the audit. Based on a survey distributed to Israeli citizens, our findings indicate that trust in the political system and expectations about procedural justice in it are related to expectations that state auditors should exercise their discretion and conduct broad audits. There are also complex relationships between citizens’ perceptions about the effectiveness of the channels available to them to influence the government and their expectations that auditors should exercise their discretion.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPublic Management Review
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

  • Accountability
  • democracy
  • discretion
  • public attitudes
  • public auditing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Administration

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Putting auditing in the context of democratic governance: the question of auditing discretion from the public’s perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this