Abstract
Thirty one patients in treatment for anxiety disorders and 31 controls were interviewed within hours after both the first and second Iraqi missile attacks on Israel during the Gulf war. After the first attack patients did not report higher anxiety levels, nor were they more pessimistic about the war and their fate in the war than the control subjects. Anxiety disorder patients tended to be engaged in cognitive-behavioral tactics for self-calming, while control subjects clearly preferred to cope by interacting with their social and physical environments. Following the second missile bombardment, patients were more inclined to retain their initial levels of anxiety and pessimism, while controls seem to have better adapted and showed significant improvements in those variables. The results are discussed in terms of coping skills and vulnerability as factors influencing adaptation to prolonged emergency situations.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 207-221 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Journal of Traumatic Stress |
Volume | 9 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1996 |
Keywords
- adaptation
- anxiety disorder
- coping styles
- emergency
- the Gulf war
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health