Abstract
Emmanuel Levinas is one of the most elaborately discussed moral philosophers of recent decades, and his philosophy has many adherents. I believe, however, that the scholarly literature on his work is overly expository and insufficiently critical. In this article I try to take some steps toward filling this gap in Levinas scholarship. My aim is not to present another exegetical account of Levinas’s philosophy but rather to point at under-discussed problems in it. I will suggest here that some central claims in Levinas’s philosophy are highly problematic, indeed, too problematic to accept.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 455-465 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | European Legacy |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 4 Jul 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2021 International Society for the Study of European Ideas.
Keywords
- Levinas
- accusation
- ethics
- guilt
- morality
- otherness
- responsibility
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Cultural Studies
- History
- Philosophy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Problems in Levinas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver