Preliminary Comparison Among Recycling Rates for Developed and Developing Countries: The Case of India, Israel, Italy and USA

Francesco Di Maria, Ronald L. Mersky, Shira Daskal, Ofira Ayalon, Sadhan K. Ghosh

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This paper examines the recycling rates for waste management systems implemented in different countries: India, Israel, Italy and USA. Recycling rates range from a minimum of about 20% for Israel up to about 44% for Italy. Indian recycling rates are affected by a large informal sector providing waste reuse and recycling at source (about 15%) and at waste collection sites (15%), even as >30% of produced waste is not collected. A high level of uncontrolled dumping up to 70% was found for India. Substantial differences were found in the legal and legislative frameworks for waste management. Absence of clear definitions and classifications of waste was detected for India and Israel leading to inconsistent data concerning the amount and composition of waste generated. With the exception of Italy, in all the other countries a lack of a fully implemented political, legal and economic scheme for supporting efficient management in the waste sector was detected.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSustainable Waste Management
Subtitle of host publicationPolicies and Case Studies: 7th IconSWM—ISWMAW 2017: Volume 1
PublisherSpringer Singapore
Pages1-13
Number of pages13
ISBN (Electronic)9789811370717
ISBN (Print)9789811370700
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020.

Keywords

  • Developed countries
  • Developing countries
  • Recycling rates
  • Waste management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Environmental Science
  • General Earth and Planetary Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Preliminary Comparison Among Recycling Rates for Developed and Developing Countries: The Case of India, Israel, Italy and USA'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this