Peters edition v. Batt: The intertextuality of silence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


The article deals, on the one hand, with a legal conflict between a musical performer/arranger, Mike Batt, and the estate of a composer of avant-garde music, John Cage, over copyright. It is also concerned with the field of intertextuality - how meaning is created in a text or in a work of art, whether it is visual, musical or verbal, through allusions and quotations to previous texts or works of art. The controversy, which did not reach the courts because of a pre-trial settlement, was over an author's rights to silence, or, as in this case, a silent piece of music. The central issue discussed is the way in which silence may be considered - if at all, to be protectable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)285-303
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Journal for the Semiotics of Law
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 2007

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Law


Dive into the research topics of 'Peters edition v. Batt: The intertextuality of silence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this