Parent-to-Child Violence: Does Gender Matter in Sentencing Decisions?

Gila Chen, Eitan Nicotra, Noam Haviv, Sharon Toys

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The purpose was to examine gender differences (a) in the sentencing severity for parent-to-child violence (PCV); and (b) in severity of PCV patterns. We analyzed 99 verdict cases in Israel. Two models, a logistic regression model and a generalized ordered logistic regression model, were applied. The findings of the first model indicated that being a woman reduced the odds of imprisonment by.106; furthermore, being tried after implementation of the 2012 reform in judicial discretion in sentencing significantly increased the odds of sentence severity by 2.85. The second model indicated that women had lower odds of being involved in severe violent offenses against their minor children compared with men (OR = 0.31). The findings highlight the source of sentencing differentials.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1604-1626
Number of pages23
JournalCrime and Delinquency
Volume68
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.

Keywords

  • gender differences
  • judicial discretion
  • parent-to-child violence
  • sentence severity
  • violent crime

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Parent-to-Child Violence: Does Gender Matter in Sentencing Decisions?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this