Orchidopexy in cryptorchidism assessed by clinical, histologic and sperm examinations

J. A. Bar-Maor, S. Nissan, O. Z. Lernau, M. Oren, E. Levy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A study was undertaken of 187 patients with unilateral and 41 patients with bilateral cryptorchidism before and after orchidopexy. The mean tubular diameter and the mean tubular fertility index were used as quantitative criteria for assessment of the development of the testes. Before orchidopexy, no significant differences were found between scrotal and cryptorchid testes in patients up to six years of age. Thereafter, the scrotal testis showed marked development in distinction to the cryptorchid testis. After orchidopexy, follow-up examinations were carried out when the patients had reached the age of at least 18 years. Based on the results of the mean tubular diameter and the mean tubular fertility index, a reasonable degree of fertility would be expected in both the unilateral and the bilateral cryptorchid testes. However, histologic assessment of spermatogenesis in the unilateral cryptorchid testes after orchidopexy showed spermatogenic arrest in 81 percent and in all patients with bilateral cryptorchid testes after orchidopexy. In the unilateral orchidopexy patients, in distinction to the histologic assessment of spermatogenesis, sperm counts gave good results in 80 percent; evidently, in these patients, the source of the spermatozoa was the contralateral scrotal testis. That spermatogenesis was defective in 20 percent of the patients after unilateral orchidopexy suggests an underlying systemic factor affecting both testes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)855-859
Number of pages5
JournalSurgery Gynecology and Obstetrics
Volume148
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1979
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Orchidopexy in cryptorchidism assessed by clinical, histologic and sperm examinations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this