Online Friendship Formation, Communication Channels, and Social Closeness

Gustavo Mesch, Ilan Talmud

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Studies of the quality of online social relationships are divided in their conclusions regarding the strength of social ties. Early conceptualizations described the weakness of electronic media in supporting social
ties. By contrast, others have emphasized the compensating character of the Internet for specific social groups.
This study investigated differences between adolescents who created online friendships and those who did not, and how far the place where a friend was met (online or face to face) was related to the quality of social
relationships, namely the perceived strength of social ties. Examining the dyadic friendship structure of a representative sample of Israeli adolescents, the study provides important contributions to the rapidly growing
literature on online social relationships in general, and on youth networks in particular. The results support the social compensation approach to the study of online social relationship formation. The motivation for online
friendship formation proved to be related to adolescents’ attempts to compensate for a lack of social support by using the Internet for communication. Furthermore, while face-to-face relationships remained highly important,
for those adolescents who found in the Internet others with whom they developed intimacy, online ties were strong and meaningful. Additionally, adolescents with strong virtual ties were found to be distinctive in their
social background. Our findings call for a qualification of the theoretical approach to online social ties, and imply that it is not the technology per se that obstructs or facilitates the formation of social friendship but the
social embeddedness of the ties.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-44
JournalInternational Journal of Internet Sciences
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2006


Dive into the research topics of 'Online Friendship Formation, Communication Channels, and Social Closeness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this