Abstract
While both medical law and medical ethics have developed in a way that has sought to prioritise patient autonomy, it is less clear whether it has done so in a way that enhances the self-determination of patients from non-western backgrounds. In this article, we consider the desire of some patients from non-western backgrounds for family involvement in decision-making and argue that this desire is not catered for effectively in either medical law or medical ethics. We examine an alternative approach based on relational autonomy that might serve both to allow such patients to exercise their self-determination while still allowing them to include family members in the decision-making process.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 375-399 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Medical Law Review |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press; all rights reserved.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Autonomy
- Consent
- Ethnicity
- Family
- Medical law
- Relational autonomy
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'One size fits all? On patient autonomy, medical decisionmaking, and the impact of culture'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver