Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

One size fits all? On patient autonomy, medical decisionmaking, and the impact of culture

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

While both medical law and medical ethics have developed in a way that has sought to prioritise patient autonomy, it is less clear whether it has done so in a way that enhances the self-determination of patients from non-western backgrounds. In this article, we consider the desire of some patients from non-western backgrounds for family involvement in decision-making and argue that this desire is not catered for effectively in either medical law or medical ethics. We examine an alternative approach based on relational autonomy that might serve both to allow such patients to exercise their self-determination while still allowing them to include family members in the decision-making process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)375-399
Number of pages25
JournalMedical Law Review
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2015
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press; all rights reserved.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Autonomy
  • Consent
  • Ethnicity
  • Family
  • Medical law
  • Relational autonomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'One size fits all? On patient autonomy, medical decisionmaking, and the impact of culture'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this