On the equivalence of common approaches to lighting insensitive recognition

Margarita Osadchy, David W. Jacobs, Michael Lindenbaum

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

Lighting variation is commonly handled by methods invariant to additive and multiplicative changes in image intensity. It has been demonstrated that comparing images using the direction of the gradient can produce broader insensitivity to changes in lighting conditions, even for 3D scenes. We analyze two common approaches to image comparison that are invariant, normalized correlation using small correlation windows, and comparison based on a large set of oriented difference of Gaussian filters. We show analytically that these methods calculate a monotonic (cosine) function of the gradient direction difference and hence are equivalent to the direction of gradient method. Our analysis is supported with experiments on both synthetic and real scenes.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings - 10th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV 2005
Pages1721-1726
Number of pages6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005
EventProceedings - 10th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV 2005 - Beijing, China
Duration: 17 Oct 200520 Oct 2005

Publication series

NameProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision
VolumeII

Conference

ConferenceProceedings - 10th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV 2005
Country/TerritoryChina
CityBeijing
Period17/10/0520/10/05

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Acknowledgements--This work was supported by the Hungarian Research Fund (L.N.), a fellowship from Pro Cultura Renovanda Hungariae (A.M.C.) and l'Association Franqaise contre les Myopathies.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On the equivalence of common approaches to lighting insensitive recognition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this