Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Of lyric proportions: poetry and the genres of climate-change communications

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Since the publication of Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus’ ‘The death of environmentalism’ in 2004, environmental strategists and communications experts have debated about how best to frame climate change for a general public. While some affirm the power of dystopian messaging, others advocate for more positive visions of the future. Yet consistent across viewpoints has been a virtually unquestioned investment in narrative and, of late, in an epic mode of narrative storytelling seen as best suited to portray this massively-scaled environmental crisis. But why epic? Why not lyric? This essay surveys a growing overlap between the fields of climate-change communications and genre studies to make a case for the role that lyric poetry might play in representing and responding to climate change. The essay argues that lyric’s generic distinctions and historical entailments uniquely position it to engage local and global climate impacts, and to provide alternatives to logics of personhood and the public sphere that have historically undergirded cultures of environmental degradation.

Original languageEnglish
JournalTextual Practice
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
  2. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Keywords

  • Climate-change communications
  • ecopoetics
  • epic
  • genre studies
  • lyric

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Literature and Literary Theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Of lyric proportions: poetry and the genres of climate-change communications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this