Abstract
This chapter begins with a discussion of existing literature on automatic, nonconscious goal pursuit. The adaptiveness paradox: On the one hand, in order to be effective, nonconscious goal pursuit must be adaptive. On the other hand, nonconscious, automatic processes are widely believed to rely on existing networks of associations and are hence thought to be inflexible. Three new hypotheses are proposed to resolve the paradox, because at their core lies the contention that working memory (WM) is involved in nonconscious goal pursuit. It is argued that given the nature of WM involvement in nonconscious goal pursuit allows them to be flexible. A series of studies that focus on one particular type of automatic processes—nonconscious goal pursuit—is reviewed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Oxford handbook of human action |
Editors | E. Morsella, J. A. Bargh, P. M. Gollwitzer |
Place of Publication | New York |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Pages | 549–566 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Volume | 2 |
State | Published - 2009 |