Non-deterministic multi-valued matrices for first-order logics of formal inconsistency

Arnon Avron, Anna Zamansky

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

Paraconsistent logic is the study of contradictory yet non-trivial theories. One of the best-known approaches to designing useful paraconsistent logics is da Costa's approach, which has led to the family of Logics of Formal Inconsistency (LFIs), where the notion of inconsistency is expressed at the object level. In this paper we use non-deterministic matrices, a generalization of standard multivalued matrices, to provide simple and modular finite-valued semantics for a large family of first-order LFIs. The modular approach provides new insights into the semantic role of each of the studied axioms and the dependencies between them. For instance, four of the axioms of LFI1*, a first-order system designed in [8] for treating inconsistent databases, are shown to be derivable from the rest of its axioms. We also prove the effectiveness of our semantics, a crucial property for constructing counterexamples, and apply it to show a non-trivial proof-theoretical property of the studied LFIs.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication37th International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic, ISMVL 2007
PublisherIEEE Computer Society
Pages14-19
Number of pages6
ISBN (Print)0769528317, 9780769528311
DOIs
StatePublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes
Event37th International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic, ISMVL 2007 - Oslo, Norway
Duration: 13 May 200716 May 2007

Publication series

NameProceedings of The International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic
ISSN (Print)0195-623X

Conference

Conference37th International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic, ISMVL 2007
Country/TerritoryNorway
CityOslo
Period13/05/0716/05/07

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Computer Science
  • General Mathematics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Non-deterministic multi-valued matrices for first-order logics of formal inconsistency'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this