Neuronal response specificity as a marker of reading proficiency: Two-fold nature of the N170 revealed after massive repetition

  • Sebastian P. Korinth
  • , Werner Sommer
  • , Zvia Breznitz

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Reading demands precise and efficient letter and word processing. This event-related potentials (ERP) study utilized massive repetition of visually presented single letters to trigger neuronal adaptation. Our aim was to explore whether the adaptation pattern of the N170 ERP component, serving as an indicator of neuronal response specificity, would differ for two reader groups. Forty German students, divided at the median into slow and fast readers, accomplished a visual oddball paradigm. ERPs of standard stimuli were computed separately for the first, second, and third part of the experiment. ERP waveforms and independent component analyses showed two subcomponents within the N170 time window. For both reader groups, the ERP amplitudes decreased over the time course of the experiment; however, only faster readers showed a subcomponent-specific adaptation response, restricted to the earlier N170 part. Results may reflect different degrees of neuronal response specificity in slow and fast readers, which might serve as a promising indicator for interindividual differences in visual recognition tasks such as reading.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)96-100
    Number of pages5
    JournalNeuroReport
    Volume24
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 23 Jan 2013

    Keywords

    • Adaptation
    • Event-related potential
    • Habituation
    • Individual differences
    • N1
    • N170
    • Neural response specificity
    • Oddball
    • Reading speed
    • Repetition

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General Neuroscience

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Neuronal response specificity as a marker of reading proficiency: Two-fold nature of the N170 revealed after massive repetition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this