Nash bargaining with (almost) no rationality

Shiran Rachmilevitch

doi:10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2015.04.007

Nash bargaining with (almost) no rationality

Shiran Rachmilevitch

Department of Economics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

I axiomatize the n-person asymmetric Nash bargaining solution on the basis of independence of irrelevant alternatives, independence of equivalent utility representations, feasible set continuity, and conflict-freeness-the requirement that the solution selects the ideal point whenever it is feasible to do so.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	107-109
Number of pages	3
Journal	Mathematical Social Sciences
Volume	76
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2015.04.007
State	Published - 1 Jul 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier B.V..

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sociology and Political Science
General Social Sciences
General Psychology
Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty

Access to Document

10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2015.04.007

Cite this

@article{9dace5d1b6e14ad18b58c7ffc69f4164,

title = "Nash bargaining with (almost) no rationality",

abstract = "I axiomatize the n-person asymmetric Nash bargaining solution on the basis of independence of irrelevant alternatives, independence of equivalent utility representations, feasible set continuity, and conflict-freeness-the requirement that the solution selects the ideal point whenever it is feasible to do so.",

author = "Shiran Rachmilevitch",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2015 Elsevier B.V..",

year = "2015",

month = jul,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2015.04.007",

language = "English",

volume = "76",

pages = "107--109",

journal = "Mathematical Social Sciences",

issn = "0165-4896",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nash bargaining with (almost) no rationality

AU - Rachmilevitch, Shiran

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - I axiomatize the n-person asymmetric Nash bargaining solution on the basis of independence of irrelevant alternatives, independence of equivalent utility representations, feasible set continuity, and conflict-freeness-the requirement that the solution selects the ideal point whenever it is feasible to do so.

AB - I axiomatize the n-person asymmetric Nash bargaining solution on the basis of independence of irrelevant alternatives, independence of equivalent utility representations, feasible set continuity, and conflict-freeness-the requirement that the solution selects the ideal point whenever it is feasible to do so.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84929404296

U2 - 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2015.04.007

DO - 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2015.04.007

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84929404296

SN - 0165-4896

VL - 76

SP - 107

EP - 109

JO - Mathematical Social Sciences

JF - Mathematical Social Sciences

ER -

Nash bargaining with (almost) no rationality

Abstract

Bibliographical note

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this