Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Morphological decomposition in reading hebrew homographs

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The present work investigates whether and how morphological decomposition processes bias the reading of Hebrew heterophonic homographs, i.e., unique orthographic patterns that are associated with two separate phonological, semantic entities depicted by means of two morphological structures (linear and nonlinear). In order to reveal the nature of morphological processes involved in the reading of Hebrew homographs, we tested 146 university students with three computerized experiments, each experiment focusing on a different level of processing. Participants were divided into three experimental groups given that the three experiments used the same stimulus lists. Evidence obtained from the analysis of the participants’ processing time and processing accuracy points to a propensity to process heterophonic homographs by default as morpho-syntactically simple rather than complex words. Findings are discussed with reference to assumptions made by Dual-Route models regarding the importance of morphological knowledge in fast and accurate access of written words’ representations which mediate the retrieval of their meanings with direct reference to the context in which they occur.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)717-738
    Number of pages22
    JournalJournal of Psycholinguistic Research
    Volume45
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 3 May 2016

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher Copyright:
    © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015.

    Keywords

    • Decomposition
    • Dual-route model
    • Hebrew
    • Morphology

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Language and Linguistics
    • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
    • General Psychology
    • Linguistics and Language

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Morphological decomposition in reading hebrew homographs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this