Abstract
Adam and Eve have the same record yet receive different punishments. Adam receives the punishment that they both deserve, whereas Eve receives a more lenient punishment. In this article, we explore whether a deserved-but-unequal punishment, such as what Adam receives, can be just. We do this by explicating the conceptions of retributive justice that underlie both sides of the debate. We argue that inequality in punishment is disturbing mainly because of the disrespect it often expresses towards the offender receiving the harsher treatment, and also because it casts doubt on whether Adam got what he deserved. We suggest that when no disrespect is involved and when it is clear that the criminal got what he deserved, inequality is not worrisome.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 316-333 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Utilitas |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2013 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Philosophy
- Sociology and Political Science