Missing, Presumed Not Dead

Samuel Lebens

doi:10.1007/s11406-020-00267-6

Missing, Presumed Not Dead

Samuel Lebens

Department of Philosophy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that if we have reason to believe that an immaterial soul exists, then (absent evidence to the contrary) it should be presumed to be immortal. The conclusion is weaker than Socrates’ conclusion that immaterial souls must be immortal, but the argument is stronger, I claim, for having this weaker conclusion. Moreover, a presumption of immortality is significant in its own right.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1043-1050
Number of pages	8
Journal	Philosophia (United States)
Volume	49
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-020-00267-6
State	Published - Jul 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer Nature B.V.

Keywords

Afterlife
Death
Socrates
Souls

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Philosophy

Access to Document

10.1007/s11406-020-00267-6

Cite this

@article{18a8ac9ed9a6499e8f6069b4acf673f0,

title = "Missing, Presumed Not Dead",

abstract = "In this paper, I argue that if we have reason to believe that an immaterial soul exists, then (absent evidence to the contrary) it should be presumed to be immortal. The conclusion is weaker than Socrates{\textquoteright} conclusion that immaterial souls must be immortal, but the argument is stronger, I claim, for having this weaker conclusion. Moreover, a presumption of immortality is significant in its own right.",

keywords = "Afterlife, Death, Socrates, Souls",

author = "Samuel Lebens",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020, Springer Nature B.V.",

year = "2021",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1007/s11406-020-00267-6",

language = "English",

volume = "49",

pages = "1043--1050",

journal = "Philosophia (United States)",

issn = "0048-3893",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Missing, Presumed Not Dead

AU - Lebens, Samuel

PY - 2021/7

Y1 - 2021/7

N2 - In this paper, I argue that if we have reason to believe that an immaterial soul exists, then (absent evidence to the contrary) it should be presumed to be immortal. The conclusion is weaker than Socrates’ conclusion that immaterial souls must be immortal, but the argument is stronger, I claim, for having this weaker conclusion. Moreover, a presumption of immortality is significant in its own right.

AB - In this paper, I argue that if we have reason to believe that an immaterial soul exists, then (absent evidence to the contrary) it should be presumed to be immortal. The conclusion is weaker than Socrates’ conclusion that immaterial souls must be immortal, but the argument is stronger, I claim, for having this weaker conclusion. Moreover, a presumption of immortality is significant in its own right.

KW - Afterlife

KW - Death

KW - Socrates

KW - Souls

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091297012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11406-020-00267-6

DO - 10.1007/s11406-020-00267-6

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85091297012

SN - 0048-3893

VL - 49

SP - 1043

EP - 1050

JO - Philosophia (United States)

JF - Philosophia (United States)

IS - 3

ER -

Missing, Presumed Not Dead

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this