Minimizing inappropriate behavior following goal setting

Gary P. Latham, Guy Itzchakov

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Numerous experiments have shown that when (1) only a self-report measure of performance is used as the dependent variable, (2) for which there are no consequences for exaggerating how well one performed the task, and a (3) performance goal as opposed to a learning or a behavioral goal is (4) assigned rather than self-set or set participatively, (5) without taking into account an individual's ability and the required resources to attain it, two moderators specified by goal setting theory, some people may not tell the truth as to how well they performed a laboratory task. Most importantly, (6) in a field setting, an organization's culture can have an adverse effect on the causal goal-performance relationship. The present chapter reviews the goal setting literature as to ways to mitigate the effect of these six impediments to the normally beneficial effect of goals on performance.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Future of Human Resource Management
PublisherEmerald Publishing
Pages511-524
Number of pages14
ISBN (Electronic)9798887308166
ISBN (Print)9798887308159
StatePublished - 30 May 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by Information Age Publishing. All rights reserved.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Business, Management and Accounting
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Minimizing inappropriate behavior following goal setting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this