Abstract
Issue is taken with the arguments offered by Neeley & Barton to explain interassemblage variability in the Epipalaeolithic. The techno-typological attributes they discuss do, indeed, mark cultural/temporal traditions and there are no grounds for viewing them as representing stages within a reduction sequence.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 375-381 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Antiquity |
| Volume | 69 |
| Issue number | 263 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 1995 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Archaeology
- General Arts and Humanities
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Microburins and microliths of the Levantine Epipalaeolithic: A comment on the paper by Neely & Barton'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver