Microburins and microliths of the Levantine Epipalaeolithic: A comment on the paper by Neely & Barton

Daniel Kaufman

doi:10.1017/S0003598X00064784

Microburins and microliths of the Levantine Epipalaeolithic: A comment on the paper by Neely & Barton

Daniel Kaufman

Department of Archaeology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Issue is taken with the arguments offered by Neeley & Barton to explain interassemblage variability in the Epipalaeolithic. The techno-typological attributes they discuss do, indeed, mark cultural/temporal traditions and there are no grounds for viewing them as representing stages within a reduction sequence.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	375-381
Number of pages	7
Journal	Antiquity
Volume	69
Issue number	263
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00064784
State	Published - Jun 1995

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Archaeology
Arts and Humanities (all)

Access to Document

10.1017/S0003598X00064784

Cite this

@article{84310b1db54b4f0887cb2e564b95641c,

title = "Microburins and microliths of the Levantine Epipalaeolithic: A comment on the paper by Neely & Barton",

abstract = "Issue is taken with the arguments offered by Neeley & Barton to explain interassemblage variability in the Epipalaeolithic. The techno-typological attributes they discuss do, indeed, mark cultural/temporal traditions and there are no grounds for viewing them as representing stages within a reduction sequence.",

author = "Daniel Kaufman",

year = "1995",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1017/S0003598X00064784",

language = "English",

volume = "69",

pages = "375--381",

journal = "Antiquity",

issn = "0003-598X",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

number = "263",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Microburins and microliths of the Levantine Epipalaeolithic

T2 - A comment on the paper by Neely & Barton

AU - Kaufman, Daniel

PY - 1995/6

Y1 - 1995/6

N2 - Issue is taken with the arguments offered by Neeley & Barton to explain interassemblage variability in the Epipalaeolithic. The techno-typological attributes they discuss do, indeed, mark cultural/temporal traditions and there are no grounds for viewing them as representing stages within a reduction sequence.

AB - Issue is taken with the arguments offered by Neeley & Barton to explain interassemblage variability in the Epipalaeolithic. The techno-typological attributes they discuss do, indeed, mark cultural/temporal traditions and there are no grounds for viewing them as representing stages within a reduction sequence.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0040222705&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0003598X00064784

DO - 10.1017/S0003598X00064784

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0040222705

SN - 0003-598X

VL - 69

SP - 375

EP - 381

JO - Antiquity

JF - Antiquity

IS - 263

ER -

Microburins and microliths of the Levantine Epipalaeolithic: A comment on the paper by Neely & Barton

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this