Mental health workers' perspectives on the implementation of a peer support intervention in five countries: qualitative findings from the UPSIDES study

Maria Hildegard Haun, Selina Girit, Yael Goldfarb, Jasmine Kalha, Palak Korde, Eric Kwebiiha, Galia Moran, Rachel Mtei, Jackline Niwemuhwezi, Lena Nugent, Bernd Puschner, Mary Ramesh, Grace Kathryn Ryan, Mike Slade, Ashleigh Charles, Silvia Krumm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective The introduction of peer support in mental health teams creates opportunities and challenges for both peer and non-peer staff. However, the majority of research on mental health workers' (MHWs) experiences with peer support comes from high-income countries. Using Peer Support In Developing Empowering Mental Health Services (UPSIDES) is an international multicentre study, which aims at scaling up peer support for people with severe mental illness in Europe, Asia and Africa. This study investigates MHWs experiences with UPSIDES peer support. Design Six focus groups with MHWs were conducted approximately 18 months after the implementation of the UPSIDES peer support intervention. Transcripts were analysed with a descriptive approach using thematic content analysis. Setting Qualitative data were collected in Ulm and Hamburg (Germany), Butabika (Uganda), Dar es Salaam (Tanzania), Be'er Sheva (Israel) and Pune (India). Participants 25 MHWs (19 females and 6 males) from UPSIDES study sites in the UPSIDES Trial (ISRCTN26008944) participated. Findings Five overarching themes were identified in MHWs' discussions: MHWs valued peer support workers (PSWs) for sharing their lived experiences with service users (theme 1), gained trust in peer support over time (theme 2) and provided support to them (theme 3). Participants from lower-resource study sites reported additional benefits, including reduced workload. PSWs extending their roles beyond what MHWs perceived as appropriate was described as a challenge (theme 4). Perceptions about PSWs varied based on previous peer support experience, ranging from considering PSWs as equal team members to viewing them as service users (theme 5). Conclusions Considering local context is essential in order to understand MHWs' views on the cooperation with PSWs. Especially in settings with less prior experience of peer support, implementers should make extra effort to promote interaction between MHWs and PSWs. In order to better understand the determinants of successful implementation of peer support in diverse settings, further research should investigate the impact of contextual factors (eg, resource availability and cultural values). Trial registration number ISRCTN26008944.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere081963
JournalBMJ Open
Volume14
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 May 2024
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • implementation science
  • mental health
  • psychiatry
  • qualitative research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mental health workers' perspectives on the implementation of a peer support intervention in five countries: qualitative findings from the UPSIDES study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this