Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Mental health and psychosocial support interventions for populations affected by ongoing armed conflict: a scoping review

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Over 2 billion people worldwide are affected by ongoing armed conflict. The wide-ranging impact of conflict on populations’ mental health is well documented. However, less is known about the scope of mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) interventions implemented during periods of active armed conflict. This scoping review assesses the scope of published original articles and summarises existing evidence on MHPSS interventions for populations (civilians, internally displaced persons and veterans/ex-combatants) affected by ongoing armed conflict. It further outlines evidence gaps and proposed strategies to strengthen research and evaluation systems for MHPSS in these settings. Methods: The scoping review was conducted in accordance with the framework for scoping reviews described by Arksey and O’Malley (2005) and followed the guidelines for scoping reviews provided in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses, extension for Scoping Reviews (Tricco et al., 2018). Results: A total of 47 papers were included in the scoping review: 19 exclusively focused on children and adolescents, 14 exclusively on adults and 14 on both children/adolescents and adults. Across all population groups, only 12 papers investigated trauma-focused interventions. Many studies reported statistically significant positive outcomes in both adult civilians and ex-combatants with respect to decreased post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and anxiety symptomatology and improved psychosocial functioning, well-being and quality of life. Results were mixed in children/adolescents and when examining aggression, drug dependence and social/interpersonal skills in ex-combatants. Conclusion: The wide heterogeneity of research designs, results and clinical instruments used to assess changes in mental health and psychosocial outcomes across studies indicates the need for improved research standards when evaluating MHPSS interventions in ongoing conflict settings.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere022708
JournalBMJ Global Health
Volume11
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ Group. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Mental Health & Psychiatry
  • Review
  • Treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mental health and psychosocial support interventions for populations affected by ongoing armed conflict: a scoping review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this