MEDLEM database, a data collection on large elasmobranchs in the Mediterranean and Black Seas

Cecilia Mancusi, Romano Baino, Caterina Fortuna, Luis Gil De Sola, Gabriel Morey, Mohamed Nejmeddine Bradaï, Argyrios Kallianotis, Alen Soldo, Farid Hemida, Adib Ali Saad, Mark Dimech, Panagiota Peristeraki, Michel Bariche, Simona Clò, Eleonora De Sabata, Laura Castellano, Fulvio Garibaldi, Luca Lanteri, Fausto Tinti, Antonio PaisEmilio Sperone, Primo Micarelli, Francois Poisson, Letizia Sion, Roberto Carlucci, Daniel Cebrian-Menchero, Bernard Séret, Francesco Ferretti, Alaa El-Far, Ismet Saygu, Esmail A. Shakman, Àlex Bartolí, Javier Guallart, Dimitrios Damalas, Persefoni Megalofonou, Marino Vacchi, Francesco Colloca, Massimiliano Bottaro, Giuseppe Notarbartolo Di Sciara, Maria Cristina Follesa, Rita Cannas, Hakan Kabasakal, Bruno Zava, Graziella Cavlan, Armelle Jung, Mohammed Abudaya, Jerina Kolitari, Adi Barash, Aleksandar Joksimovic, Ilija Cetkovic, Bojan Marčeta, Luis Gonzalez Vilas, Francesco Tiralongo, Ioannis Giovos, Filippo Bargnesi, Stefano Lelli, Monica Barone, Stefano Moro, Carlotta Mazzoldi, Charilaou Charis, Alvaro Juan Abella, Fabrizio Serena

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The Mediterranean Large Elasmobranchs Monitoring (MEDLEM) database contains more than 3,000 records (with more than 4,000 individuals) of large elasmobranch species from 21 different countries around the Mediterranean and Black seas, observed from 1666 to 2017. The principal species included in the archive are the devil ray (1,868 individuals), the basking shark (935 individuals), the blue shark (622 individuals), and the great white shark (342 individuals). In the last decades, other species such as the thresher shark (187 individuals), the shortfin mako (180 individuals), and the spiny butterfly ray (138) were reported with increasing frequency. This was possibly due to increased public awareness on the conservation status of sharks, and the consequent development of new monitoring programs. MEDLEM does not have homogeneous reporting coverage throughout the Mediterranean and Black seas and it should be considered as a database of observed species presence. Scientific monitoring efforts in the south-eastern Mediterranean and Black seas are generally lower than in the northern sectors and the absence of some species in our database does not imply their actual absence in these regions. However, the available data allowed us to analyse the frequency and spatial distribution of records, the size frequencies for a few selected the available data allowed us to analyse the frequency and spatial distribution of records, the size frequencies for a few selected species, the overall area coverage, and which species are involved as bycatch by different fishing gears.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)276-288
Number of pages13
JournalMediterranean Marine Science
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Mediterranean Marine Science.

Keywords

  • Bycatch
  • Databases
  • Geographical distribution
  • Large elasmobranchs
  • Mediterranean and black seas
  • Sharks

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oceanography
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Aquatic Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'MEDLEM database, a data collection on large elasmobranchs in the Mediterranean and Black Seas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this