Abstract
This article advances the literature on media effects by examining how contrasting partisan narratives influence support for regulation after a real-world corporate scandal. Using both multi-wave observational and randomized experimental data, we show that self-selected media exposure and experimentally assigned information shape public opinion in distinct ways. While scandals are narratives of regulatory failure, partisan media environments differently attribute blame for that failure. In two separate observational waves, only Democrats exposed to news about the FTX bankruptcy increased their support for crypto regulation. In the experiment, only Republicans shifted in favor of regulation. Research on media effects needs to take into account not only media content, but also the partisan information environments that expose citizens to that content.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Political Science Research and Methods |
| DOIs | |
| State | Accepted/In press - 2026 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press.
Keywords
- corporate scandal
- cryptocurrency
- media effects
- public opinion
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Media effects revisited: corporate scandals, partisan narratives, and attitudes toward cryptocurrency regulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver