Mathematics Teachers’ Use of Content-specific Data for Dialogic Grouping

Rotem Abdu, Shai Olsher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Group composition affects learning by individuals. Dialogic pedagogy approaches demonstrate that this is particularly true when each grouped student knows something others do not (i.e., mutuality grouping). Learning analytics can help grouping by providing teachers with data on students’ content-specific learning. What are mathematics teachers’ considerations in grouping students based on such data? We analysed fifty-three acts of grouping by nine mathematics teachers, who used data about students’ solutions to a mathematical task on linear functions to group students into pairs. We propose a schematic model including two types of considerations: interpersonal (here, mutuality, encompassing, and similarity) and content-specific (here, methods of construction, function orientation, and correctness). In this study, encompassing was the leading interpersonal characteristic, and function orientation was the leading content-specific characteristic. Moreover, different teachers formed the same groups using various considerations. The teachers utilised learning analytics to group students, and we modelled their grouping considerations.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1
JournalMathematics Teacher Education and Development
Volume27
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Inc.

Keywords

  • group learning
  • mathematics teacher education research
  • personal example space
  • teachers’ grouping considerations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • General Mathematics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mathematics Teachers’ Use of Content-specific Data for Dialogic Grouping'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this