Management of coral reefs: We have gone wrong when neglecting active reef restoration

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The current best management tools employed in coral reefs worldwide do not achieve conservation objectives as coral reefs continue to degrade. Even improved reef management helps, at best, to reduce the degradation pace, whereas the worsening global changes foretell a dismal fate for coral reefs. The assertion made here is that the prospect for reefs' future is centered on omnipresent acceptance of restoration, an 'active' management instrument. A recent promising such tool is the 'gardening concept', influenced by the well-established scientific discipline of terrestrial forestation. This notion is supported by a two-step protocol. The first step entails rearing coral "seedlings", in specially designed underwater nurseries, to transplantable size, before applying the second step, out-planting into damaged areas of the nursery-farmed coral colonies. Only the establishment of large-scale nurseries and transplantation actions, together with conventional management tools, will be able to cope with extensive reef degradation on the global scale.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1821-1824
Number of pages4
JournalMarine Pollution Bulletin
Volume56
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2008
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Studies detailed here are supported by INCO-DEV project (REEFRES, no: 510657), by the World Bank/GEF project (reef remediation/restoration working group), by a grant from the Israeli Ministry of Infrastructure and by the AID-CDR program (No. C23-004).

Keywords

  • Coral reef
  • Gardening
  • Management
  • Marine protected areas
  • Restoration
  • Silviculture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pollution
  • Aquatic Science
  • Oceanography

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Management of coral reefs: We have gone wrong when neglecting active reef restoration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this