Making the Case for a Feasible Evaluation Method of Available E-Mental Health Products

Amit Baumel

doi:10.1007/s10488-016-0764-z

Making the Case for a Feasible Evaluation Method of Available E-Mental Health Products

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

It is often difficult for health providers to evaluate available e-mental health products because of the need to balance between obtaining reliable evidence of efficacy and the burdens associated with standard empirical evaluation. This paper makes the case for using a feasible method to investigate available e-mental health programs in order to promote knowledge and increase the uptake of e-mental health products.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1-4
Number of pages	4
Journal	Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
Volume	45
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-016-0764-z
State	Published - 1 Jan 2018
Externally published	Yes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York.

Keywords

Evaluation
Intervention
Mental health
Technology
eHealth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Psychiatric Mental Health
Health Policy
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Psychiatry and Mental health

Access to Document

10.1007/s10488-016-0764-z

Cite this

@article{bddc6d6ee7324cfe8374eee2a2703176,

title = "Making the Case for a Feasible Evaluation Method of Available E-Mental Health Products",

abstract = "It is often difficult for health providers to evaluate available e-mental health products because of the need to balance between obtaining reliable evidence of efficacy and the burdens associated with standard empirical evaluation. This paper makes the case for using a feasible method to investigate available e-mental health programs in order to promote knowledge and increase the uptake of e-mental health products.",

keywords = "Evaluation, Intervention, Mental health, Technology, eHealth",

author = "Amit Baumel",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York.",

year = "2018",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/s10488-016-0764-z",

language = "English",

volume = "45",

pages = "1--4",

journal = "Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research",

issn = "0894-587X",

publisher = "Springer New York",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making the Case for a Feasible Evaluation Method of Available E-Mental Health Products

AU - Baumel, Amit

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - It is often difficult for health providers to evaluate available e-mental health products because of the need to balance between obtaining reliable evidence of efficacy and the burdens associated with standard empirical evaluation. This paper makes the case for using a feasible method to investigate available e-mental health programs in order to promote knowledge and increase the uptake of e-mental health products.

AB - It is often difficult for health providers to evaluate available e-mental health products because of the need to balance between obtaining reliable evidence of efficacy and the burdens associated with standard empirical evaluation. This paper makes the case for using a feasible method to investigate available e-mental health programs in order to promote knowledge and increase the uptake of e-mental health products.

KW - Evaluation

KW - Intervention

KW - Mental health

KW - Technology

KW - eHealth

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84987625154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10488-016-0764-z

DO - 10.1007/s10488-016-0764-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 27620191

AN - SCOPUS:84987625154

SN - 0894-587X

VL - 45

SP - 1

EP - 4

JO - Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

JF - Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

IS - 1

ER -

Making the Case for a Feasible Evaluation Method of Available E-Mental Health Products

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this