Lefort and Rancière on democracy and sovereignty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


This paper focuses on Lefort’s and Rancière’s conceptions of democracy as a set of conflictual processes through which the composition of the public sphere is reassessed. Reading their works together and sometimes in opposition to each other, the paper extracts elements of a theory of inessential sovereignty that avoids the pitfalls of populist antagonism and of neoliberal diffuse domination. It analyses Lefort’s and Rancière’s understandings of democracy as rule of the people, which are based on ontological and aesthetical distinctions between ‘politics’ and ‘the political’. It argues that in the structural situation of dissensus described by both Lefort and Rancière, popular sovereignty could be conceptualized as lying in an ability to shape and transform the public sphere.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)323-342
Number of pages20
JournalPhilosophy and Social Criticism
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022.


  • Lefort
  • Rancière
  • democracy
  • dissensus
  • rights
  • sovereignty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Sociology and Political Science


Dive into the research topics of 'Lefort and Rancière on democracy and sovereignty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this