Abstract
In this chapter, the author seeks to answer the question, “Why do some affluent societies adopt socioeconomic inequality and some do not?" and suggests governmental/leadership ideology as the major factor. This chapter presents secondary analysis of data from research conducted on members (about 700) from 32 kibbutzim, both “traditional” and “differential”. Transformed kibbutzim are called “differential” and the ones which stay communal - “traditional”.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Psychological Perspectives on Diversity and Social Development |
| Publisher | Springer Singapore |
| Pages | 201-216 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9789811333415 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9789811333408 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2019 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- Comprehensive mutual responsibility
- Differential Kibbutzim
- Leadership ideology
- Socioeconomic inequality
- Traditional kibbutzim
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Psychology
- General Social Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Leadership Ideology and Socioeconomic Inequality: The Case of Israeli Kibbutzim'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver