Laypersons’ priority-setting preferences for allocating a COVID-19 patient to a ventilator: Does a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease matter?

Perla Werner, Ruth Landau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: The current study aimed 1) to assess laypersons’ priority-setting preferences for allocating ventilators to COVID-19 patients with and without AD while differentiating between a young and an old person with the disease, and 2) to examine the factors associated with these preferences. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among a sample of 309 Israeli Jewish persons aged 40 and above. Results: Overall, almost three quarters (71%) of the participants chose the 80-year-old patient with a diagnosis of AD to be the last to be provided with a ventilator. The preferences of the remaining quarter were divided between the 80-year-old person who was cognitively intact and the 55-year-old person with AD. Education and subjective knowledge about AD were significantly associated with participants’ preferences. Conclusion: Our results suggest that cognitive status might not be a strong discriminating factor for laypersons’ preferences for allocating ventilators during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2407-2414
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Interventions in Aging
Volume15
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Werner and Landau.

Keywords

  • Care rationing
  • Dementia
  • Pandemic
  • Prioritizing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Laypersons’ priority-setting preferences for allocating a COVID-19 patient to a ventilator: Does a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease matter?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this