Landmarks in the Evolution of Liberal Thought: Freedom, Plurality, Knowledge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In the past few decades, liberal and democratic thought has been subjected to attacks from the adherents of nationalism, populism, and social radicalism. Much of these attacks involve suspicions about liberalism’s association with the contents and purveyors of structured knowledge, scientific and humanistic alike. I suggest that an examination of the history of liberal beliefs may add to our understanding of what is at stake. Such an examination may reveal how liberal thought in the twentieth century shifted away from its earlier individualist and constitutional position towards the pluralist position that grants a special place to educated knowledge, to experts and professionals, and thus invites allegations of elitism. In particular, I focus on the differences between the ideas that conventional liberal authors elaborated during early modernity and the nineteenth century, on the one hand, and the version of liberal values and the polity based on them that were tacitly adopted during the mid-twentieth century, on the other hand. The examination involves highlighting the common denominators of mid-century authors on right, left, and centre, such as Laski, Popper and Hayek, as well as asking what in their shared worldview could attract allegations of elitism from later generations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)471-490
Number of pages20
JournalEuropean Legacy
Volume29
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

  • Enlightenment
  • liberalism
  • pluralism
  • populism
  • private sphere
  • public sphere

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • History
  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Landmarks in the Evolution of Liberal Thought: Freedom, Plurality, Knowledge'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this