Judgment by Outcomes: Why Is It Interesting? A Reply to Hershey and Baron: "Judgment by Outcomes: When Is It Justified?"

Raanan Lipshitz

doi:10.1006/obhd.1995.1037

Judgment by Outcomes: Why Is It Interesting? A Reply to Hershey and Baron: "Judgment by Outcomes: When Is It Justified?"

Raanan Lipshitz

Department of Psychology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial

Abstract

Hershey and Baron (1992) have criticized the validity of research on judgment by outcomes, which fail to establish that this judgment constitutes a bias. This reply argues that Hershey and Baron′s criticism is based on a probabilistic version of affirming the consequent and that judgment by outcomes can be studied independently of the issue of bias.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	123-126
Number of pages	4
Journal	Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Volume	62
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1037
State	Published - Apr 1995

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Applied Psychology
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Access to Document

10.1006/obhd.1995.1037

Cite this

@article{32fb70655a6447b2a18d5e00b54913b7,

title = "Judgment by Outcomes: Why Is It Interesting? A Reply to Hershey and Baron: {"}Judgment by Outcomes: When Is It Justified?{"}",

abstract = "Hershey and Baron (1992) have criticized the validity of research on judgment by outcomes, which fail to establish that this judgment constitutes a bias. This reply argues that Hershey and Baron′s criticism is based on a probabilistic version of affirming the consequent and that judgment by outcomes can be studied independently of the issue of bias.",

author = "Raanan Lipshitz",

year = "1995",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1006/obhd.1995.1037",

language = "English",

volume = "62",

pages = "123--126",

journal = "Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes",

issn = "0749-5978",

publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Judgment by Outcomes

T2 - Why Is It Interesting? A Reply to Hershey and Baron: "Judgment by Outcomes: When Is It Justified?"

AU - Lipshitz, Raanan

PY - 1995/4

Y1 - 1995/4

N2 - Hershey and Baron (1992) have criticized the validity of research on judgment by outcomes, which fail to establish that this judgment constitutes a bias. This reply argues that Hershey and Baron′s criticism is based on a probabilistic version of affirming the consequent and that judgment by outcomes can be studied independently of the issue of bias.

AB - Hershey and Baron (1992) have criticized the validity of research on judgment by outcomes, which fail to establish that this judgment constitutes a bias. This reply argues that Hershey and Baron′s criticism is based on a probabilistic version of affirming the consequent and that judgment by outcomes can be studied independently of the issue of bias.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0041985697

U2 - 10.1006/obhd.1995.1037

DO - 10.1006/obhd.1995.1037

M3 - Editorial

AN - SCOPUS:0041985697

SN - 0749-5978

VL - 62

SP - 123

EP - 126

JO - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

JF - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

IS - 1

ER -

Judgment by Outcomes: Why Is It Interesting? A Reply to Hershey and Baron: "Judgment by Outcomes: When Is It Justified?"

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this