Is it enough to 'speak Haredi'? Cultural sensitivity in social workers encountering Jewish Ultra-Orthodox clients in Israel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Cultural sensitivity is expressed in every therapeutic session, in particular when working with communities characterised by specific internal cultural codes, such as the Haredi (Ultra-Orthodox Jewish) community in Israel. The present article explores how social workers express their cultural sensitivity in encounters with Haredi clients. A qualitative research was conducted, consisting of thirty-three in-depth interviews with social workers intervening with Haredi clients. Three major themes emerged: the social worker's preparation for the encounter; use of conventional Haredi language and content in the therapy session; therapeutic intervention: between rabbinical and professional authorities. The act of 'speaking Haredi' reflects the complex reality of demonstrating cultural sensitivity in social work practice. It requires a conscientious and reflective process, which enables social workers to construct their own professional identity and analyse their attitudes towards the Ultra-Orthodox client. Speaking both Haredi and professional languages, the unfamiliar becomes familiar to both parties.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)968-987
Number of pages20
JournalBritish Journal of Social Work
Volume45
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Cultural sensitivity
  • Qualitative methods
  • Religion
  • Social work intervention
  • Ultra-Orthodox society

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is it enough to 'speak Haredi'? Cultural sensitivity in social workers encountering Jewish Ultra-Orthodox clients in Israel'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this