Is God a person? Maimonides, Crescas, and beyond

Samuel Lebens

doi:10.1017/S0034412521000299

Is God a person? Maimonides, Crescas, and beyond

Samuel Lebens

Department of Philosophy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Drawing from multiple generations of Jewish philosophy (from Maimonides until today), this article argues for the seemingly paradoxical conclusion that God is both fully, and not at all, a person. The apparent contradiction in this conclusion is resolved by appeal to a two-layered ontology.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	S34-S60
Journal	Religious Studies
Volume	58
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412521000299
State	Published - 1 Oct 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021.

Keywords

Crescas
Hassidism
Heschel
Maimonides
Open Theism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Religious studies
Philosophy

Access to Document

10.1017/S0034412521000299

Cite this

@article{27e5a04087e14a33be8a46482fdf1752,

title = "Is God a person? Maimonides, Crescas, and beyond",

abstract = "Drawing from multiple generations of Jewish philosophy (from Maimonides until today), this article argues for the seemingly paradoxical conclusion that God is both fully, and not at all, a person. The apparent contradiction in this conclusion is resolved by appeal to a two-layered ontology.",

keywords = "Crescas, Hassidism, Heschel, Maimonides, Open Theism",

author = "Samuel Lebens",

note = "Publisher Copyright: Copyright {\textcopyright} The Author(s), 2021.",

year = "2022",

month = oct,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1017/S0034412521000299",

language = "English",

volume = "58",

pages = "S34--S60",

journal = "Religious Studies",

issn = "0034-4125",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is God a person? Maimonides, Crescas, and beyond

AU - Lebens, Samuel

PY - 2022/10/1

Y1 - 2022/10/1

N2 - Drawing from multiple generations of Jewish philosophy (from Maimonides until today), this article argues for the seemingly paradoxical conclusion that God is both fully, and not at all, a person. The apparent contradiction in this conclusion is resolved by appeal to a two-layered ontology.

AB - Drawing from multiple generations of Jewish philosophy (from Maimonides until today), this article argues for the seemingly paradoxical conclusion that God is both fully, and not at all, a person. The apparent contradiction in this conclusion is resolved by appeal to a two-layered ontology.

KW - Crescas

KW - Hassidism

KW - Heschel

KW - Maimonides

KW - Open Theism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115614592&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0034412521000299

DO - 10.1017/S0034412521000299

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85115614592

SN - 0034-4125

VL - 58

SP - S34-S60

JO - Religious Studies

JF - Religious Studies

ER -

Is God a person? Maimonides, Crescas, and beyond

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this