TY - JOUR
T1 - Interplay between negative and positive design elements in Gα helical domains of G proteins determines interaction specificity toward RGS2
AU - Kasom, Mohammad
AU - Gharra, Samia
AU - Sadiya, Isra
AU - Avital-Shacham, Meirav
AU - Kosloff, Mickey
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Author(s).
PY - 2018/7/25
Y1 - 2018/7/25
N2 - Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins inactivate Gα subunits, thereby controlling G protein-coupled signaling networks. Among all RGS proteins, RGS2 is unique in interacting only with the Gα q but not with the Gα i subfamily. Previous studies suggested that this specificity is determined by the RGS domain and, in particular, by three RGS2-specific residues that lead to a unique mode of interaction with Gα q . This interaction was further proposed to act through contacts with the Gα GTPase domain. Here, we combined energy calculations and GTPase activity measurements to determine which Gα residues dictate specificity toward RGS2. We identified putative specificity-determining residues in the Gα helical domain, which among G proteins is found only in Gα subunits. Replacing these helical domain residues in Gα i with their Gα q counterparts resulted in a dramatic specificity switch toward RGS2. We further show that Gα–RGS2 specificity is set by Gα i residues that perturb interactions with RGS2, and by Gα q residues that enhance these interactions. These results show, for the first time, that the Gα helical domain is central to dictating specificity toward RGS2, suggesting that this domain plays a general role in governing Gα-RGS specificity. Our insights provide new options for manipulating RGS–G protein interactions in vivo, for better understanding of their ‘wiring’ into signaling networks, and for devising novel drugs targeting such interactions.
AB - Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins inactivate Gα subunits, thereby controlling G protein-coupled signaling networks. Among all RGS proteins, RGS2 is unique in interacting only with the Gα q but not with the Gα i subfamily. Previous studies suggested that this specificity is determined by the RGS domain and, in particular, by three RGS2-specific residues that lead to a unique mode of interaction with Gα q . This interaction was further proposed to act through contacts with the Gα GTPase domain. Here, we combined energy calculations and GTPase activity measurements to determine which Gα residues dictate specificity toward RGS2. We identified putative specificity-determining residues in the Gα helical domain, which among G proteins is found only in Gα subunits. Replacing these helical domain residues in Gα i with their Gα q counterparts resulted in a dramatic specificity switch toward RGS2. We further show that Gα–RGS2 specificity is set by Gα i residues that perturb interactions with RGS2, and by Gα q residues that enhance these interactions. These results show, for the first time, that the Gα helical domain is central to dictating specificity toward RGS2, suggesting that this domain plays a general role in governing Gα-RGS specificity. Our insights provide new options for manipulating RGS–G protein interactions in vivo, for better understanding of their ‘wiring’ into signaling networks, and for devising novel drugs targeting such interactions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050559466&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1042/BCJ20180285
DO - 10.1042/BCJ20180285
M3 - Article
C2 - 29925530
AN - SCOPUS:85050559466
SN - 0264-6021
VL - 475
SP - 2293
EP - 2304
JO - Biochemical Journal
JF - Biochemical Journal
IS - 14
ER -