Illness management and recovery: Generic issues of group format implementation

David Roe; David L. Penn; Lynn Bortz; Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon; Karen Hartwell; Sarah Roe

doi:10.1080/15487760701346214

Illness management and recovery: Generic issues of group format implementation

David Roe, David L. Penn, Lynn Bortz, Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon, Karen Hartwell, Sarah Roe

Department of Community Mental Health

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

A recent development in psychiatric rehabilitation is the identification and standardization of evidence-based practices (EBP). In this article we report on the implementation of one of the EBPs, Illness Management and Recovery (IMR), in a group format in two settings and cultures, Israel and the United States (North Carolina) to address generic issues of implementation that arise across settings. The unique characteristics of the group format, ways in which they can be both enriching and challenging, and the importance of considering local cultural influences when using a standardized EBP are discussed.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	131-147
Number of pages	17
Journal	American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation
Volume	10
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/15487760701346214
State	Published - Apr 2007

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The National EBP Implementation Project, developed and spear-headed by the Psychiatric Rehabilitation Center at Dartmouth, was funded by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMSHA). As part of the project, implementation resource kits were developed for the five psychosocial EBPs: supported employment, family psychoeducation, integrated dual disorder treatment, assertive community treatment, and IMR. The kits can be downloaded from the SAMSHA website at http:// www.mentalhealthpractices.org. The purpose of this article is to describe and discuss the generic issues and cultural influences related to the group format implementation of one of the EBPs, IMR, at two locations, each in a different culture. One location was in Israel, the other in North Carolina, U.S.A.

Keywords

Evidence based practices
Illness management
Implementation
Recovery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Rehabilitation
Psychiatry and Mental health

Access to Document

10.1080/15487760701346214

Cite this

@article{8ad02e6db5714018a77d0ecfbd8303cf,

title = "Illness management and recovery: Generic issues of group format implementation",

abstract = "A recent development in psychiatric rehabilitation is the identification and standardization of evidence-based practices (EBP). In this article we report on the implementation of one of the EBPs, Illness Management and Recovery (IMR), in a group format in two settings and cultures, Israel and the United States (North Carolina) to address generic issues of implementation that arise across settings. The unique characteristics of the group format, ways in which they can be both enriching and challenging, and the importance of considering local cultural influences when using a standardized EBP are discussed.",

keywords = "Evidence based practices, Illness management, Implementation, Recovery",

author = "David Roe and Penn, {David L.} and Lynn Bortz and Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon and Karen Hartwell and Sarah Roe",

note = "Funding Information: The National EBP Implementation Project, developed and spear-headed by the Psychiatric Rehabilitation Center at Dartmouth, was funded by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMSHA). As part of the project, implementation resource kits were developed for the five psychosocial EBPs: supported employment, family psychoeducation, integrated dual disorder treatment, assertive community treatment, and IMR. The kits can be downloaded from the SAMSHA website at http:// www.mentalhealthpractices.org. The purpose of this article is to describe and discuss the generic issues and cultural influences related to the group format implementation of one of the EBPs, IMR, at two locations, each in a different culture. One location was in Israel, the other in North Carolina, U.S.A.",

year = "2007",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1080/15487760701346214",

language = "English",

volume = "10",

pages = "131--147",

journal = "American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation",

issn = "1548-7768",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Illness management and recovery

T2 - Generic issues of group format implementation

AU - Roe, David

AU - Penn, David L.

AU - Bortz, Lynn

AU - Hasson-Ohayon, Ilanit

AU - Hartwell, Karen

AU - Roe, Sarah

N1 - Funding Information: The National EBP Implementation Project, developed and spear-headed by the Psychiatric Rehabilitation Center at Dartmouth, was funded by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMSHA). As part of the project, implementation resource kits were developed for the five psychosocial EBPs: supported employment, family psychoeducation, integrated dual disorder treatment, assertive community treatment, and IMR. The kits can be downloaded from the SAMSHA website at http:// www.mentalhealthpractices.org. The purpose of this article is to describe and discuss the generic issues and cultural influences related to the group format implementation of one of the EBPs, IMR, at two locations, each in a different culture. One location was in Israel, the other in North Carolina, U.S.A.

PY - 2007/4

Y1 - 2007/4

N2 - A recent development in psychiatric rehabilitation is the identification and standardization of evidence-based practices (EBP). In this article we report on the implementation of one of the EBPs, Illness Management and Recovery (IMR), in a group format in two settings and cultures, Israel and the United States (North Carolina) to address generic issues of implementation that arise across settings. The unique characteristics of the group format, ways in which they can be both enriching and challenging, and the importance of considering local cultural influences when using a standardized EBP are discussed.

AB - A recent development in psychiatric rehabilitation is the identification and standardization of evidence-based practices (EBP). In this article we report on the implementation of one of the EBPs, Illness Management and Recovery (IMR), in a group format in two settings and cultures, Israel and the United States (North Carolina) to address generic issues of implementation that arise across settings. The unique characteristics of the group format, ways in which they can be both enriching and challenging, and the importance of considering local cultural influences when using a standardized EBP are discussed.

KW - Evidence based practices

KW - Illness management

KW - Implementation

KW - Recovery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250160509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15487760701346214

DO - 10.1080/15487760701346214

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34250160509

SN - 1548-7768

VL - 10

SP - 131

EP - 147

JO - American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation

JF - American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation

IS - 2

ER -

Illness management and recovery: Generic issues of group format implementation

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this