Identifying barriers for nature-based solutions in flood risk management: An interdisciplinary overview using expert community approach

Pavel Raška, Nejc Bezak, Carla S.S. Ferreira, Zahra Kalantari, Kazimierz Banasik, Miriam Bertola, Mary Bourke, Artemi Cerdà, Peter Davids, Mariana Madruga de Brito, Rhys Evans, David C. Finger, Rares Halbac-Cotoara-Zamfir, Mashor Housh, Artan Hysa, Jiří Jakubínský, Marijana Kapović Solomun, Maria Kaufmann, Saskia Keesstra, Emine KelesSilvia Kohnová, Michele Pezzagno, Kristina Potočki, Samuel Rufat, Samaneh Seifollahi-Aghmiuni, Arthur Schindelegger, Mojca Šraj, Gintautas Stankunavicius, Jannes Stolte, Ružica Stričević, Jan Szolgay, Vesna Zupanc, Lenka Slavíková, Thomas Hartmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The major event that hit Europe in summer 2021 reminds society that floods are recurrent and among the costliest and deadliest natural hazards. The long-term flood risk management (FRM) efforts preferring sole technical measures to prevent and mitigate floods have shown to be not sufficiently effective and sensitive to the environment. Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) mark a recent paradigm shift of FRM towards solutions that use nature-derived features, processes and management options to improve water retention and mitigate floods. Yet, the empirical evidence on the effects of NBS across various settings remains fragmented and their implementation faces a series of institutional barriers. In this paper, we adopt a community expert perspective drawing upon LAND4FLOOD Natural flood retention on private land network (https://www.land4flood.eu) in order to identify a set of barriers and their cascading and compound interactions relevant to individual NBS. The experts identified a comprehensive set of 17 barriers affecting the implementation of 12 groups of NBS in both urban and rural settings in five European regional environmental domains (i.e., Boreal, Atlantic, Continental, Alpine-Carpathian, and Mediterranean). Based on the results, we define avenues for further research, connecting hydrology and soil science, on the one hand, and land use planning, social geography and economics, on the other. Our suggestions ultimately call for a transdisciplinary turn in the research of NBS in FRM.

Original languageEnglish
Article number114725
JournalJournal of Environmental Management
Volume310
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 May 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The networking of authors was funded by COST Action LAND4FLOOD ( CA16209 ) supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology, www.cost.eu ) and complementary national InterCost Project ( MŠMT LTC18025 ). N. Bezak and M. Šraj work was partially supported by the Slovene Research Agency ( ARRS ) through grant P2-0180 and conducted in the scope of the UNESCO Chair on Water-related Disaster Risk Reduction.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd

Keywords

  • Europe
  • Flood risk management
  • Implementation barrier
  • Nature-based solution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Identifying barriers for nature-based solutions in flood risk management: An interdisciplinary overview using expert community approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this