In this study, we focus on attitudes towards asylum seekers in two countries: Denmark and Israel. Both serve as interesting cases through which to study public sentiment of host populations for people seeking refuge. We examine the role of three core dimensions that have been relatively overlooked in previous studies: social contact with asylum seekers, the role of support for humanitarian policies and perceptions of legitimacy of the asylum seekers’ claims. We also gauge the way perceptions of threat mediate the effect of these core dimensions on individuals’ willingness to share their national benefits with those looking for refugee status in the two countries. For the analysis, we use multiple group structural equation modelling. On the descriptive level, findings suggest that respondents are considerably more hostile in Israel than in Denmark, although the mechanisms leading to the formation of exclusionary attitudes are partly similar. We conclude with some limitations of the study and closing remarks about similarities and differences across the two countries.
|Number of pages||24|
|Journal||International Journal of Comparative Sociology|
|State||Published - 1 Oct 2017|
Bibliographical noteFunding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The data collection in Denmark was funded by a research grant awarded to the first author by the Danish Israeli Study Foundation in memory of Josef and Regine Nachemsohn.
© 2017, © The Author(s) 2017.
- Asylum seekers
- attitudes to granting rights
- humanitarian policy
- non-genuine refugees
- perceptions of threat
- social contact
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)