Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Hacking Voters’ Trust in Democracy: Panel Evidence on Safeguarding Confidence in Election Integrity

  • Ryan Shandler
  • , Iris Ong
  • , Olivia Leu
  • , Anthony DeMattee

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

We are experiencing a crisis of trust in democracy. As elections become increasingly digitized, voters have grown uneasy with the digital infrastructure that underpins the electoral process. This study investigates how cyber threat narratives erode trust in the integrity of elections, and tests targeted interventions to counteract this effect. Using a pre-registered, two-wave survey experiment fielded during the 2024 election, we find that media coverage of cyberattacks significantly undermines perceptions of electoral integrity, an effect that spans party lines. Even cyberattacks unrelated to elections reduced trust in voting systems, suggesting that voters generalize digital insecurity. However, offering some hope, we also identify an intervention that counteracts the negative effect. By inoculating participants four weeks earlier with a short video describing election safeguards, participants maintained stable trust levels despite their later exposure to threatening content. These findings offer a new perspective on democratic trust in an age of digital elections.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPolitical Behavior
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2026
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2026.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Cyberattacks
  • Election integrity
  • Inoculation
  • Political trust
  • Survey experiment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hacking Voters’ Trust in Democracy: Panel Evidence on Safeguarding Confidence in Election Integrity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this