Abstract
Global equality of opportunity and national self-determination are two central principles of a liberal theory of international justice, but the relationship between them remains contested. The purpose of this chapter is to provide a sound understating of the contention – where the tensions and possible contradiction between self-determination and global equality of opportunity lie – and then propose a way forward. To this end the chapter reviews the main approaches to this issue in contemporary political theory: the incompatibility thesis, the tradeoff thesis, and moves on to lay out the possibility of reconciliation between selfdetermination and equal opportunity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Handbook of Equality of Opportunity |
| Publisher | Springer International Publishing |
| Pages | 131-146 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9783031558979 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9783031558962 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- Dometic analogy
- Global equality of opportunity
- Internationalism
- Relationship goods
- Self-determination
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Social Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Global Equality of Opportunity and National Self-Determination'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver