Gender group differences in coping with chronic terror: The Israeli scene

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review


    Gender group differences in terror-stress, cognitive appraisals, ways of coping with terror, and stress reactions were explored in a sample of Israeli adults following prolonged exposure to political violence. Data were gathered at the height of the Al-Aqsa Intifada uprising (May/July 2002) from a sample of 707 adult participants (60% women and 40% men) residing in Haifa and northern Israel. Israeli women reported that they were more distressed by political violence than the men did, and they also appraised the crisis situation as more threatening and less manageable. Women reported using more problem-focused as well as emotion-focused coping than men did; both men and women used a mixture of coping strategies. Compared to men, women reported that they experienced more somatic symptoms and more frequent posttraumatic stress symptoms than men did. Negative affectivity was found to mediate gender differences in appraisals, coping, and outcomes. Overall, the nexus of relations among key variables was found to be highly similar for men and women. These data suggest that women may be more reactive to chronic political violence situations than men are. The data are discussed and explicated in the context of stress and coping theory and prior research on political violence and community disasters.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)297-310
    Number of pages14
    JournalSex Roles
    Issue number3-4
    StatePublished - Feb 2006


    • Coping
    • Disasters
    • Gender
    • Political violence
    • Terror
    • Traumatic stress

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Gender Studies
    • Social Psychology
    • Developmental and Educational Psychology


    Dive into the research topics of 'Gender group differences in coping with chronic terror: The Israeli scene'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this